Depending on what
culture you are from you may have experienced what I am about to
describe. In my country it is very much the case in the service
sector of the market that younger and younger people are employed as
front line personel. In short, people of the new school.
Aside from the obvious
financial benefit this has brought to the employers, since younger,
inexperienced people are cheaper, it may be worth pointing out
another very important point about this situation.
In the past when the
service sector was a relatively fresh industry, following the
downsizing of the work force in aggriculture caused by the technology
available around the start of the 20th century, there was
a period where it had include a certain flexibility to market itself.
The kind of flexibility you would probably only experience presently
if you get in contact with someone with a higher grade of
responsibility than the service level. The shop keeper or to a lesser
extent the manager. Most managers would not apply though. They are
put in place to uphold the rules put down by their own employer and
their job is based mostly on making sure the staff beneath them bends
no rules and applies no flexibility.
Not because the
industry tries to work against flexibility, but because the total
stream lining of the service sector has allowed for a much more rigid
rule set. If you do not like the rules in place at a restaurant or a
store, you are pretty much out of luck. Because you can be certain
that a quite similar set of rules are in place in whatever other
place you may visit.
This may or may not
bother you. If it does not I would venture the guess that it is
because you have not thought it through. Surely you would rise to
some level of discontent if you realised that you had been
manipulated into the acceptance of this.
The most modern and
”hip” places introduced this concept into our culture and since
then we have come to accept it on a daily basis. We are now at the
point where we consider good service the abnormal and remember it for
days when some employee somewhere gave us a personal experience. But
why is this? Should it not be preferable for society to accept only
bad service as the abnormal?
The reason for this
rigid business model that we are all supporting with our purchases
out of the lack of proper alternatives, is of course that it works.
It works to cut back on the extent of service, because the extent of
service mostly implies the extent of lowering expected pay for
whatever service was given. Deductions and good will are concepts
swept under the carpet and the consumer remains ever oblivious.
And this is just the
beginning. Now that the industry has us accepting a very poor
standard of service, they can easily make the transfer to automated
kiosks everywhere. In the grocery store, in the café, in the
restaurants and in the malls. For what is more rigid than a machine?
And companies know this. They exploit it. They are very much
interested in automating the process of purchasing everywhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment